Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: 10.1.1.1 up?
From: <jaye_gettes () hushmail com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:11:09 -0700
I thought -P0 was "do not ping first" in case programs like portsentry block you if you ping a host first? Also, is it not the case that a host that is not pingable (because a fw blocks ping) could allow a tcp or udp port in? thanks On Wed, 28 May 2003 13:58:13 -0700 Chad Loder <cloder () loder us> wrote:
The -P0 option assumes the box is up, which is why nmap is telling you it's up. c On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:49:06PM -0700, jaye_gettes () hushmail com wrote:I'm truly confused. this is an nmap from an externally facingRH Linuxbox: [root@katze jaye]# nmap -sS -O -P0 10.1.1.1 Starting nmap 3.27 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-05-27 23:47EDTWarning: OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we didnotfind at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port All 1623 scanned ports on 10.1.1.1 are: filtered Too many fingerprints match this host for me to give an accurateOS guessNmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1585.425secondsYet, without the "no ping", I get the expected answer: [root@katze jaye]# nmap -sS -O 10.1.1.1 Starting nmap 3.27 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-05-28 00:36EDTNote: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our pingprobes,try -P0 Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 12.319secondsSince 10.0.0.0/8 is not in BGP and is non-externally-routableaddressspace, what is cauing NMAP to tell me a box is up? thanks in advance ---------------------------------------------------------------------For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank emailtonmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
--------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- 10.1.1.1 up? jaye_gettes (May 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 10.1.1.1 up? jaye_gettes (May 30)
- Re: 10.1.1.1 up? Steven Alexander (May 30)