Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: 10.1.1.1 up?


From: <jaye_gettes () hushmail com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:11:09 -0700


I thought -P0 was "do not ping first" in case programs like portsentry
block you if you ping a host first?  Also, is it not the case that a
host that is not pingable (because a fw blocks ping) could allow a tcp
or udp port in?

thanks


On Wed, 28 May 2003 13:58:13 -0700 Chad Loder <cloder () loder us> wrote:
The -P0 option assumes the box is up, which is why nmap
is telling you it's up.

      c

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:49:06PM -0700, jaye_gettes () hushmail com
wrote:

I'm truly confused.  this is an nmap from an externally facing
RH Linux
box:

[root@katze jaye]# nmap -sS -O -P0 10.1.1.1

Starting nmap 3.27 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-05-27 23:47
EDT
Warning:  OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did
not
find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port
All 1623 scanned ports on 10.1.1.1 are: filtered
Too many fingerprints match this host for me to give an accurate
OS guess

Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1585.425
seconds

Yet, without the "no ping", I get the expected answer:

[root@katze jaye]# nmap -sS -O 10.1.1.1

Starting nmap 3.27 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-05-28 00:36
EDT
Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our ping
probes,
 try -P0
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 12.319
seconds

Since 10.0.0.0/8 is not in BGP and is non-externally-routable
address
space, what is cauing NMAP to tell me a box is up?  

thanks in advance


--------------------------------------------------------------
-------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email
to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).




---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).



Current thread: