Re: two problems and a question with nmap or nmapwin

[Bernd Zeimetz <zeimetz () rbg informatik tu-darmstadt de>]

Hi,

> Taking 233 seconds to scan one port (it's actually the machine nmap is running on) means that scanning a range of 255 
> machines might take as long as 17 hours to finish.  I swear I did the same command before installing winpcap2.3 and 
> it took less than 1 minute to do 255 addresses.  Any ideas?
>
> If I enter a range option of /16 to scan, for example, 192.168.0.0 through 192.168.255.255, the system nmap is 
> running on reboots itself!  An option of /24 is okay, but /16 and I get a reboot.  And a chance to decide whether or 
> not to run chkdsk, since it's the kind of shutdown that W2K thinks is very unkind.  Any ideas?  (This was happening 
> BEFORE I installed winpcap).




Try an operating system, not windows.


Bernd


---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).