Nmap Announce mailing list archives
Re: distrbuted nmap?
From: Jose Nazario <jose () biocserver BIOC CWRU Edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 18:53:17 -0500 (EST)
regarding the use of PVM, it was raised that PVM, MPI and other Beowulf solutions are fantastic for CPU intensive applications (like the molecular dynamics simulations i run from time to time) but would be overkill for something ike nmap. i quite disagree. i think that PVM actually provides a nice framework for what you would want to do with a distributed application like nmap. like TCP, PVM keeps track of connections and messages sent, it has very good error handling, dynamic group assignments and the like. it runs over TCP, so it provides a nice reliable data stream over the WAN. heck, it even works on NT (for the reportedly in the works nmap port to NT) these are all the kinds of things you would demand in a framework for a distrubuted application. just because it's not CPU intensive does not mean it's overkill, i'm just asking why reinvent the wheel? parallelization points are readily seen in nmap, which is the trickiest point to porting an application to any parallel structure like MPI or PVM. as such, it shouldn't be a difficult undertaking for coding. the difficulty will be in design of the model for how this would be implemented. PVM is described in detail at http://www.epm.ornl.gov/pvm/pvm_home.html jose nazario jose () biochemistry cwru edu PGP fingerprint: 89 B0 81 DA 5B FD 7E 00 99 C3 B2 CD 48 A0 07 80 Public key available at http://biocserver.cwru.edu/~jose/pgp-key.asc
Current thread:
- Re: distrbuted nmap? Jose Nazario (Mar 20)
- Re: distrbuted nmap? Juan M. Bello Rivas (Mar 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: distrbuted nmap? Lorell Hathcock (Mar 20)
- Re: distrbuted nmap? ajax (Mar 20)
- Re: distrbuted nmap? Jose Nazario (Mar 21)