nanog mailing list archives
route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR
From: Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:28:01 +0300
Hi,I got 2 bounces for the email addresses seen below for an email similar to the below...
Anyone want to remove this IRR entry before anyone notices...??? ;-) Frank I believe that the entry of route: 0.0.0.0/32 does not serve any good purpose?I was surprised to see it in a list of prefixes from bgpq4 and the very good https://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/prefix/0.0.0.0 guided me that it's in "Level3".
I'm wondering how many auto-generated filters contain this unnecessary prefix....
PS: Oh, just seen - it's from TODAY. Maybe remove before anyone sees it...? Thanks for looking into this, Frank [frank@fisi ~]$ whois -h rr.level3.com 0.0.0.0/32 [Querying rr.level3.com] [rr.level3.com] route: 0.0.0.0/32 origin: AS10753 mnt-by: TCCGlobalNV-MNT changed: ankita.grewal () lumen com source: LEVEL3 last-modified: 2024-01-30T11:04:49Z [frank@fisi ~]$ whois -h rr.level3.com TCCGlobalNV-MNT [Querying rr.level3.com] [rr.level3.com] mntner: TCCGlobalNV-MNT descr: TCC Global N.V. auth: CRYPT-PW DummyValue # Filtered for security upd-to: ripehostmaster () eu centurylink net tech-c: LTHM admin-c: LTHM mnt-by: TCCGlobalNV-MNT changed: ankita.grewal () lumen com source: LEVEL3 last-modified: 2024-01-30T11:01:52Z
Current thread:
- route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Frank Habicht (Jan 30)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Dave Taht (Jan 30)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Rubens Kuhl (Jan 30)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Tom Beecher (Jan 31)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 31)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Frank Habicht (Jan 31)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Rubens Kuhl (Jan 30)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Dave Taht (Jan 30)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Job Snijders via NANOG (Jan 30)
- Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Frank Habicht (Jan 30)