nanog mailing list archives
Re: Networks ignoring prepends?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:35:26 -0800
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:19 AM James Jun <james.jun () towardex com> wrote:
So, as a customer, you actually SHOULD be demanding your ISPs to positively identify and categorize their routes using local-pref and communities.
Hi James, The best path to me from Centurylink is: 3356 1299 20473 11875 The path Centurylink chose is: 3356 47787 47787 47787 47787 53356 11875 11875 11875 Do you want to tell me again how that's a reasonable path selection, or how I'm supposed to pass communities to either 20473 or 53356 which tell 3356 to behave itself? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends?, (continued)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Jon Lewis (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Tom Beecher (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Andrew Hoyos (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Nick Hilliard (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Alex Le Heux (Jan 23)