nanog mailing list archives
Re: Networks ignoring prepends?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 06:02:53 -0800
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 5:24 AM Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
Standard practice is to localpref your customers up, which makes prepends irrelevant. Why would anyone expect different behavior?
It gives me, your paying customer, less control over my routing through your network than if I wasn't your paying customer. That seems... backwards. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Mel Beckman (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Niels Bakker (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Jon Lewis (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Mel Beckman (Jan 22)