nanog mailing list archives

Re: Shared cache servers on an island's IXP


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:47:45 -0600 (CST)

Some will work directly on the IX via BGP. Others have to go behind a member of the IX. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jérôme Nicolle" <jerome () ceriz fr> 
To: "Mehmet" <mehmet () akcin net> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 8:38:31 AM 
Subject: Re: Shared cache servers on an island's IXP 

Hello Mehmet, 

Le 18/01/2024 à 12:58, Mehmet a écrit : 
VMs are no go for big content companies except Microsoft. You can run 
Microsoft CDN on VM but rest of the content will need to be cached. You 
can actually install this yourself 

I've already read most docs for caching servers provided by major 
actors. What I'm mostly concerned about is their ability to peer with 
multiple AS on the local IXP, as to not over-replicate them. 

Should I establish a dedicated network peering on the IXP ? Or will they 
come with their own ASNs ? The peering case is quite not documented on 
publicly available specs, if even possible. 

Depending on how much traffic do you have , you may be able to get 
facebook, youtube, netflix caches i think minimum bw requirement changes 
per region 

Those I'm nearly sure I could get, if I can pool caches amongst ISPs. 
The current constraints are issues to any content provider, not just for 
local ISPs. 

Best regards, 

-- 
Jérôme Nicolle 
+33 6 19 31 27 14 


Current thread: