nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Monitoring
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi () 4ever de>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:40:59 +0000
Hi Alex, la () qrator net (Alexander Lyamin) wrote:
Ray mentioned precisely that he wants to monitor BGP announcements and route changes. Leak detection is kind of on a different level. You need a bit more data to effectively detect them. ( I kind of know that).
Our use case is extremely simple, so the RIS feed gives us everything we need. We don't need to qualify the leak, *any* leak from a local node is undesirable, they tag everything NO_EXPORT. Anybody exporting must thus be dealt with. But you gave me an idea regarding our datacenter prefixes... Cheers, Elmar.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Monitoring, (continued)
- Re: BGP Monitoring TJ Trout (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Ian Chilton (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Job Snijders via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Denis Fondras via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Ben Cox via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Fearghas Mckay (Feb 27)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Ben Cox via NANOG (Feb 27)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Denis Fondras via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Alexander Lyamin via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Elmar K. Bins (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Alexander Lyamin via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP Monitoring Elmar K. Bins (Feb 27)