Re: Peering Contact at AS16509

[Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

Meant to reply to this thread earlier today, but a contact from 16509
reached out directly and got everything squared away for us.

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 8:56 PM Tim Burke <tim () mid net> wrote:

> We reached out some time ago using the contact on PeeringDB and had no
> issue, but the amount of transit consumed to get to 16509 is substantial
> enough to make responding worth their while.
>
> Their minimum peering is 100G, with 400G preferred, so it’s very possible
> that if you’re not consuming anywhere close to 100G, the lack of response
> could correlate to a lack of interest on their side.
>
> > On Feb 18, 2024, at 13:09, Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
> wrote:
> > 
> > If a contact who manages North American peering at AS16509 could reach
> out off-list, that would be appreciated. Myself and a few colleagues have
> attempted to reach out via the contacts listed on PeeringDB on multiple
> occasions over the last couple of months and have not been successful in
> reaching someone.
> > Kind regards,
> > Peter Potvin