nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Reg does 240/4
From: Denis Fondras via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:10:05 +0100
Le Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:24:21PM -0800, David Conrad a écrit :
This doesn’t seem all that positive to me, particularly because it’s temporary since the underlying problem (limited resource, unlimited demand) cannot be addressed.
I agree with this. Yet I am in favor of changing the status of 240/4, just so it can get burned fast, we stop this endless discussion and can start to deploy IPv6 again. Denis
Current thread:
- Re: The Reg does 240/4, (continued)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Chris Adams (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Ryan Hamel (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Denis Fondras via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)
- Message not available
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Dave Taht (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Chris Adams (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: Enough of The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 13)