nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com)
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 4 Apr 2024 15:27:52 -0400
It appears that Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> said:
verified and thus not denied. After, there were calls for providers to publish their private keys on a regular basis but that went nowhere that I've heard of.
$ host -t txt k2402._domainkey.gurus.org k2402._domainkey.gurus.org descriptive text "v=DKIM1; h=sha256; p=MIIBIj... ; n=Signing=20key=20at=20https://www.iecc.com/dkimkeys/k2402 ;" That's probably not what's going on here -- maybe they
just botched a key rollover -- but it still amusing to me that we got non-repudiation along for the ride [*].
Well, they could have gotten equally good non-repudiation by not signing at all. R's, John
Current thread:
- Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com) Adam Brenner via NANOG (Apr 03)
- Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com) nanog (Apr 03)
- Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com) Jay Acuna (Apr 04)
- Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com) Michael Thomas (Apr 04)
- Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com) John Levine (Apr 04)
- Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com) Michael Thomas (Apr 04)
- Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com) John Levine (Apr 04)