nanog mailing list archives
Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:48:43 +0300
On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 09:42, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
But when everybody upgrades, memory and processor unit prices decrease.. Vendors gain from demand.I am yet to see that trend...
Indeed. If you look like 10k/10q for Juniper their business is fairly stable in revenue and ports sold. so 1GE port costs the ~same as 1TE port, not more, not less. If there was reduction in port prices over time, then revenue would have to go down or ports sold up. Of course all this makes perfect sense, the sand order doesn't affect the sand price, all the cost is in people thinking how sand should be ordered and then designing machines which put the sand together. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?, (continued)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Saku Ytti (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? VOLKAN SALİH (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? VOLKAN SALİH (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? VOLKAN SALİH (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? William Herrin (Sep 28)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Elmar K. Bins (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Tom Beecher (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Saku Ytti (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Robert Blayzor via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Randy Bush (Sep 30)