nanog mailing list archives
Re: TACACS+ server recommendations?
From: Warren Kumari <warren () kumari net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:49:00 -0700
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:09 AM, Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net> wrote:
Ah, the good old days when I could download the latest tac_plus code from the Cisco FTP site, compile it, and off I go.
You might be thinking of the Shrubbery one — https://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ There are newer, fancier, etc ones - but this Just Works. W
But I digress. Curious if there are any operators out there that have a good recommendation on a lightweight TACACS+ server for ~200 NEs and access-control for 20-30 folks. Nothing too special, but some sort of simple command-control auth would be nice. Open-source is fine ... we've been looking at commercial options, but they're all pretty pricey and have way more features than we need. Thank you all in advance! - bryan
Current thread:
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations?, (continued)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Simon Leinen (Sep 21)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Jim (Sep 21)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Christopher Morrow (Sep 21)
- RE: TACACS+ server recommendations? Kevin Burke via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Tim Burke (Sep 22)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Mike Lewinski via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Alberto Vargas (Sep 23)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Christopher Morrow (Sep 21)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Bernhard Schmidt (Sep 25)