nanog mailing list archives

Re: AFRINIC placed in receivership


From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:26:28 -0300

CI didn’t sue AFRINIC for nothing. AFRINIC, in violation of the actual text of their bylaws attempted
to revoke CI space and created major disruptions to a number of networks in the process. Had CI
not received the injunctions they got from the courts, likely the disruption would have been much
worse and caused some pretty wide-spread outages.

If a car is stolen and then used to provide ride sharing services,
when the repo man comes along, it will cause disruption to those ride
sharing services.


Rubens


Current thread: