Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ?

[Willy Manga <mangawilly () gmail com>]

.
On 23/10/2023 16:00, nanog-request () nanog org wrote:
> Message: 19 Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:20:56 -0400 From: Amir Herzberg 
> <amir.lists () gmail com>I agree that a good, sensible 
> defense would be to simply announce your entire address block, e.g., in 
> the example, your entire /22 (with a ROA to your ASN), and filter the 
> traffic to the unused prefixes. Basically, I guess, it means that the AS 
> 0 solution shouldn't be used, at least not usually. I wonder if anyone 
> is using it , in fact. It would be nice to know if someone has the data 
> handy.

https://console.rpki-client.org/AS0.html


--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature