Re: Congestion/latency-aware routing for MPLS?

[Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>]

> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for.

I would agree.


On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:28 AM Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:39, Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:
>
> > Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as
> stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is concerned,
> is a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means it's
> effectively a 500M link.
>
> Jason also explained the TWAMP + latency solution, which is an active
> solution and doesn't rely on operator or automatic bandwidth providing
> information, but network automatically measures latency and encodes
> this information in ISIS, allowing automatic traffic engineering for
> LSP to choose the lowest latency path.
> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for.
>
> --
>   ++ytti