nanog mailing list archives

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms


From: Thomas Croghan <TCroghan () dna-communications com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:33:07 +0000

I did some work with their passive DWDM equipment. Everything was within spec and seemed to work fine for the year I 
was there after we deployed it.

Actually being honest, we did all our light loss math based on FS's specs and we ended up having to use attenuators in 
one instance. So be certain to check the certification sheets when you get your product.

On Oct 9, 2023 09:13, michael brooks - ESC <michael.brooks () adams12 org> wrote:
On the same topic, anyone have experience with the stuff from 
fs.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://fs.com__;!!IR39LLzvxw!PGJ97ToHx5NZWWby4LKNnMDU_u-xfmUhkusE-0RRoatuF_SK72zGd7KWDJvcRXLZ8JNyKO6wDKCHB9UTDCzWvMwMYSLX$>?

We use their patch cables, both SM and MM. Solid product, and good to work with (we have had them build custom-length 
cables).



michael brooks
Sr. Network Engineer
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
michael.brooks () adams12 org<mailto:michael.brooks () adams12 org>
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss"



On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:04 AM David Bass <davidbass570 () gmail com<mailto:davidbass570 () gmail com>> wrote:
On the same topic, anyone have experience with the stuff from 
fs.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://fs.com__;!!IR39LLzvxw!PGJ97ToHx5NZWWby4LKNnMDU_u-xfmUhkusE-0RRoatuF_SK72zGd7KWDJvcRXLZ8JNyKO6wDKCHB9UTDCzWvMwMYSLX$>?




This is a staff email account managed by Adams 12 Five Star Schools.  This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this email in error please notify the sender.


Current thread: