nanog mailing list archives

Re: cogent spamming directly from ARIN records?


From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 12:07:40 -0700

Based on my personal experience of getting onto the contact list of an
extremely persistent Cogent sales person, mostly, I am morbidly curious
what their CRM system looks like for cold and stale leads, and how often
these sets of non-responsive leads get passed on to new junior salespeople.
And exactly how many of those sales people there are and what
policies/management structure they work under.

It took a fair amount of effort and many strongly worded responses on my
part to eventually get my personal cellular phone number removed from their
CRM system (or at least marked as a do-not-contact).

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 6:52 PM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:

This morning I received an email from someone at Cogent asking about an
ASN I administer. They didn’t give any details, but I assumed it might be
related to some kind of network transport issue. I replied cordially,
asking them what they needed. The person then replied with a blatant spam,
advertising Cogent IP services, in violation of the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act’s
prohibition against deceptive UCE.

I believe they got the contact information from ARIN, because the ARIN
technical POC is the only place where my name and the ASN are connected. I
believe this is a violation of Cogent’s contract with ARIN. Does anybody
know how I can effectively report this to ARIN? If we can’t even police
infrastructure providers for spamming, LIOAWKI.

 -mel beckman

Current thread: