nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing?
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:22:11 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, William Herrin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 12:27 PM Aaron1 <aaron1 () gvtc com> wrote:Sounds like something uRPF would prevent Does anyone do uRPF ? lolI would hope folks are implementing uRPF on commodity broadband connections. That's one place it works great.
My home wifi AP blocked me two different ways, but once I got around that, I was able to determine that Spectrum cable Internet does appear to block spoofed source traffic. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? John Levine (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Aaron1 (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Jon Lewis (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Mark Tinka (Mar 12)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Christopher Munz-Michielin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Christopher Morrow (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Aaron1 (Mar 09)