nanog mailing list archives
Re: 128/9 cite
From: Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 22:29:48 -0400
On 6/7/23 10:13 PM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
I definitely read a detailed research paper about that incident long ago but can't find any link with any search keywords. But here is the NANOG archive. https://archive.nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/1997-10/msg00095.html https://archive.nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/1997-10/msg00110.html https://archive.nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/1997-10/msg00108.html Regards,
That's the "old" archive. That was merged in the main archive (same one this list uses) a while back.
If you sort by date you'll see a number of threads talking about the 70k BGP table size (lol). It's a fun read to see where we've come from in 26 years.
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/1997-October/date.html#123950 -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- 128/9 cite Randy Bush (Jun 07)
- Re: 128/9 cite Aftab Siddiqui (Jun 07)
- Re: 128/9 cite Randy Bush (Jun 07)
- Re: 128/9 cite Mark Tinka (Jun 07)
- Re: 128/9 cite Bryan Fields (Jun 07)
- Re: 128/9 cite Randy Bush (Jun 07)
- Re: 128/9 cite Aftab Siddiqui (Jun 07)