nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP range for lease
From: Noah <noah () neo co tz>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 18:23:14 +0300
Hi KARIM, Considering the fact that IPs are requested on need-basis by resource holders to number your own networks/systems and that of your clients? Any reason why MEKTEL would want to offer IPs for lease? Cheers, *.**/noah* On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:16 PM KARIM MEKKAOUI <amekkaoui () mektel ca> wrote:
Dear NANOG Community, MEKTEL has a block of IPs that would like to offer in parts or in total for lease and would like to know from your experience your comments on the following: 1. The right price 2. The challenges you faced 3. Was it easy to get back your IPs 4. Was your IPs black listed because of the inappropriate use 5. Any other issue we need to care about 6. Etc., etc. Thank you in advance KARIM MEKTEL INC.
Current thread:
- IP range for lease KARIM MEKKAOUI (Jul 03)
- Re: IP range for lease Noah (Jul 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IP range for lease Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jul 09)
- IP range for lease Sylvain Baya (Jul 10)
- Re: IP range for lease Tom Beecher (Jul 10)
- Re: IP range for lease Rubens Kuhl (Jul 10)
- Re: IP range for lease Delong.com via NANOG (Jul 11)
- IP range for lease Sylvain Baya (Jul 10)
- Re: IP range for lease John Curran (Jul 10)
- Re: IP range for lease Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jul 11)
- Re: IP range for lease John Curran (Jul 11)
- Re: IP range for lease Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jul 11)
- Re: IP range for lease John Curran (Jul 11)