nanog mailing list archives
Re: SDN Internet Router (sir)
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:07:38 +0900
Christopher Morrow wrote:
Some of the reasoning behind 'i need/want to do SDN things' is 'low fib device' sort of reasonings.
What? SDN is a poor alternative for those who can't construct a network with fully automated QoS guarantee. Even with SDN, QoS guarantee implies QoS routing requiring dedicated routing table entry for each flow, which will not shrink but bloat routing tables regardless of whether you call it FIB or not. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mel Beckman (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Tom Beecher (Jan 04)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Christopher Morrow (Jan 04)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Matthew Walster via NANOG (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Matthew Walster via NANOG (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 07)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Matthew Walster via NANOG (Jan 07)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 07)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 10)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 10)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 11)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 11)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mel Beckman (Jan 03)