![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:30:48 -0500
Having the opt out is nice, but if I am being completely honest, it gives me pause as to what the intent of this survey is in the first place. I perhaps may be hyper cynical, but those feel like a straight line towards the standard salesperson line of "look at what you are spending now on FOO , you could save X if you used BAR". On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:12 PM Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann () gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:15 PM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:I was also off put by some of the financial questions in there.The financial questions (2 of them) both allow opt-out if that is a sticking point. They are also both as vague as possible (large ranges, not exact figures) while still providing something to baseline against.
Current thread:
- 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Chris Grundemann (Feb 20)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Chris Grundemann (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Denis Fondras (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Tom Beecher (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Chris Grundemann (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Tom Beecher (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Chris Grundemann (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Lou D (Feb 28)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Chris Grundemann (Feb 28)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Denis Fondras (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Chris Grundemann (Feb 27)
- Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey Chris Grundemann (Feb 27)