nanog mailing list archives
Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 05:49:07 +0200
On 8/21/23 16:51, Ryan Hamel wrote:
Paschal,It is not supported, nor is it recommended for redundancy in a routed setup. Please describe your (desired) topology, that way the community can discuss alternatives.
Sounds like the OP wants to build a chassis-based system out of non-redundant hardware.
Mark.
Current thread:
- MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Pascal Masha (Aug 21)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Ryan Hamel (Aug 21)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 21)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Chris (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Pascal Masha (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Tom Beecher (Aug 23)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Matt Erculiani (Aug 23)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Tom Beecher (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Aaron1 (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Tom Beecher (Aug 25)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Pascal Masha (Aug 22)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Ryan Hamel (Aug 21)