Re: Any experiences using SIIT-DC in an IXP setting ?

[Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:17 AM Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
wrote:

> The technology for IPv6 client to connect IPv4 web server on Internet is
> just not specified in IETF.
>
> Ed/
Ed, you seem to be not so familiar with the this ietf body of work

RFC6877

“ 464XLAT is a simple and scalable

   technique to quickly deploy limited IPv4 access service to IPv6-only
   edge networks without encapsulation.


”

To the OP, you can google jpix has done this.



*From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+vasilenko.eduard=huawei.com () nanog org] *On
Behalf Of *Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo

> *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2022 6:57 PM
> *To:* NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
> *Subject:* Any experiences using SIIT-DC in an IXP setting ?
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I'm looking at a use case for stateless 6-4 mappings in the context of an
> IXP.
>
>
>
> The problem we are looking to solve is allowing IXP members who have no
> IPv4 of their own and in most cases they have a /26 or /27 issued by their
> transit provider and rely on CGN to provide service to their customers.
> They do have their own AS numbers and IPv6 prefixes though.
>
>
>
> Any comments are appreciated. PM is fine too.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> /Carlos