nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)
From: Clayton Zekelman <clayton () MNSi Net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 17:07:03 -0400
At 04:51 PM 03/10/2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
Why did we need to wait for STIR/SHAKEN to do this?
Because those pushing STIR/SHAKEN though the bacronym was so cool they just had to do it, even if it wasn't going to help... :-\
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls), (continued)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) Peter Beckman (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) sronan (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) Christopher Morrow (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) sronan (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) Jawaid Bazyar (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) Nathan Angelacos (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) bzs (Oct 04)
- Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)