Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above

[Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com>]

Jay Hennigan wrote:
> On 11/21/22 16:30, Joe Maimon wrote:

> IMNSHO, if such a proposal were to gain traction, by the time that 
> gear capable of using 240/4 as unicast were to be widely deployed, 
> IPv6-capable gear would be much more widely deployed.

Considering that is already the situation, whats your point?

> META: Can whoever is doing so please stop creating new time-stamped 
> subject lines for the same topic? It makes things hard to follow.