nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported)
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 26 Mar 2022 13:02:43 -0400
It appears that JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <jordi.palet () consulintel es> said:
At the end, if you turn on IPv6 to residential customers, typically you will get 70-80% IPv6 traffic, so the state in the NAT64 using 464XLAT is lower and lower every day.
Not disagreeing, but where does that number come from? Anectodally, on my home network I see less than 50%. R's, John
Current thread:
- MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Jared Brown (Mar 25)
- RE: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Mar 25)
- v6ops-transition-comparison (was: Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported)) John Curran (Mar 26)
- Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) John Levine (Mar 26)
- Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Mar 26)
- Re: MAP-T Bjørn Mork (Mar 27)
- Re: MAP-T Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Mar 25)
- RE: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 25)
- RE: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Ben Plimpton (Mar 31)