Re: V6 still not supported

[Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

> On Mar 24, 2022, at 21:18 , James R Cutler <james.cutler () consultant com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 9:25 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org <mailto:nanog () nanog org>> wrote:
> > I think that we’re still OK on allocation policies. What I’d like to see is an end to the IPv4-think in large ISPs, 
> > such as Comcast’s continued micro allocations to their customers.
>
> What exactly is your definition of “micro allocations”? Is a prefix/56 a “micro allocation”? In over nine years of 
> being an active forum participant and customer of Comcast, I can not recall the usage of the term.

They’re issuing /60s (maximum) to residential customers.

And yes, a /56 is a micro allocation. /48 is the intended norm for IPv6 site assignments and is a perfectly reasonable 
prefix size for v6 delegation to a site.

Owen