nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: "Mark Delany" <k3f () november emu st>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:43:52 +0000
On 24Mar22, Vasilenko Eduard allegedly wrote:
Hence, the primary blocking entity for IPv6 adoption is Google: they do not support DHCPv6 for the most popular OS.
No. The primary "blocking entity" is that "legacy" ipv4 works just fine and adopting ipv6 or ipv4++ or ipv6-lite or ipv-magical is harder than doing nothing. That Google/Android don't like DHCPv6 is largely irrelevant. My five year old ISP router only supports ipv4. Yet I get to every site on the planet just fine. Give me one good reason to spend my hard earned pay on an expensive new router which supports ipv6? You have two choices: make my ipv4 router fail or make the new ipv6 router compelling. How do you propose to do either of those? Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany (Mar 24)
- RE: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 24)