nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:21:55 -0700
But I was unclear, not asking about v4 vs. v6, but about caring for / contributing to evolution of network protocols, or not. Some evolution has happened in the IPv6 world, more could happen, so it gets better. Or throw the baby?
maybe you're talking to the wrong guy. i gave a lot of blood getting dren like tla, nla, ... removed. and in the final week was told by the ietf v6 wg chair that operators did not know what a logarithm was. iij deployed v6 on our backbone in 1997. oh, and i have the tee shirt and the coffee cup. and ipv6 is still a massive pain, and our bean counters, $diety bless 'em, did not like what ipv6 deployment cost us. we are all road kill (a bad pun iff you were there) randy
Current thread:
- V6 still not supported Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 22)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported bzs (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 22)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 23)
- Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported John Levine (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)