nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Nathan Angelacos <nangel () tetrasec net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 16:31:49 -0400
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 13:17 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
We weren't part of the wars. What I saw was what eventually became ipv6 and I remember talking to one of my coworkers about how hard he thought it would be to implement. He concurred that he didn't think it would be any big deal. One of our big issues is that we didn't have anybody to interop with, that and nobody was asking for it unlike v4 features.
Classic Second System Effect, as described by Fred Brooks... in 1975. "The Mythical Man-Month" is a great book for remembering how we got here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect But as all you have said, here we are.
Current thread:
- RE: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- RE: V6 still not supported Matthew Huff (Mar 17)
- RE: V6 still not supported borg (Mar 17)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 17)
- Re: V6 still not supported borg (Mar 17)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 17)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 17)
- Re: V6 still not supported borg (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via NANOG (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Nathan Angelacos (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported surfer (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran (Mar 21)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran (Mar 21)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 22)