nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 18 Mar 2022 13:30:16 -0400
It appears that Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net> said:
At this point I would *love* to see IPv4 get extended, a software patch applied to devices, and IPv6 die a quick painless death.
The people at the IETF may be shortsighted, but not *that* shortsighted. If adding 16 more /8's would have been enough, they would have done it. But anyone with his or her eyes open knows that's silly. IPv6 certainly has its problems but it's the only bigger address space we've got. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matt Hoppes (Mar 19)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 19)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Levine (Mar 19)
- Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany (Mar 19)
- RE: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: V6 still not supported Bjørn Mork (Mar 21)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 19)
- Re: V6 still not supported borg (Mar 20)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Levine (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported bzs (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Saku Ytti (Mar 19)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Seth Mattinen (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tim Howe (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Dave Taht (Mar 09)
- Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John R. Levine (Mar 09)
- Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock David Conrad (Mar 09)
- Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John Levine (Mar 09)