nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ukraine request yikes


From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 16:15:10 -0800

Again, aside from turning off the ICANN-operated root servers (which would be pointless), the remainder of the requests 
from the UA Government Advisory Committee member are not something ICANN could/would do unilaterally regardless of the 
validity of the justification.

Regards,
-drc

On Mar 1, 2022, at 4:00 PM, virendra rode <virendra.rode () gmail com> wrote:

I concur, this is an extremely dangerous slippery slope that ICANN should refrain. There’s the possibility for 
misfires, misattribution and miscalculation that could backfire which is extremely concerning.

—
regards,
/vrode

On Mar 1, 2022, at 00:56, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:




On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 12:19 AM George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com <mailto:george.herbert () gmail com>> 
wrote:
Posted by Bill Woodcock on Twitter… https://twitter.com/woodyatpch/status/1498472865301098500?s=21 
<https://twitter.com/woodyatpch/status/1498472865301098500?s=21>

https://pastebin.com/DLbmYahS <https://pastebin.com/DLbmYahS>

Ukraine (I think I read as) want ICANN to turn root nameservers off, revoke address delegations, and turn off TLDs 
for Russia.

Seems… instability creating…

-george


Information sharing should increase during wartime, not decrease.

Restricting information is more often the playbook of authoritarian regimes,
and not something we should generally support.

Besides, GhostWriter is based out of Belarus, not Russia proper.  ^_^;
https://www.wired.com/story/ghostwriter-hackers-belarus-russia-misinformationo/ 
<https://www.wired.com/story/ghostwriter-hackers-belarus-russia-misinformationo/>

Matt




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Current thread: