nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:20:07 -0500
I would like to ask an earnest question here, because I work in an environment where IPv6 has been deployed for more than a decade, and it's just automatically part of things we do and have to solve for, so I will openly admit my perspective can be warped. I am truly curious about what the perceived blockers are for you, and others with the same perspective. You appear to run a residential ISP. There are essentially 3 things you would have to do to deploy IPv6. 1. CPE would need to support it. 2. Your network infrastructure would have to support it. 3. Subscriber services ( DHCP / DNS / IPAM ) would have to support it. Putting aside the 'zero value' idea, if you were to decide to take steps today , what are your blockers? On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:59 AM Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> wrote:
Gary, I'm the owner of the business. I answer a lot of tier 1 support calls. I read every single ticket summary. It's not denial, it's just that I'm small enough to be able to follow up on every support issue. You can claim bull if you want but my evidence can beat up your claim. On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:55 PM Gary E. Miller <gem () rellim com> wrote:Yo Josh! On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:46:56 -0500 Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> wrote:Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since 2006.Bull. I have not complained to any corporation in the last 5 years where the stanard response was not "We've never heard that complaint before". recently every one I my street complained about the same things at the same time, but we all got that response. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 gem () rellim com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jay Hennigan (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Hill (Mar 09)
- RE: V6 still not supported netElastic Systems (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Bryan Fields (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Ca By (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Gary E. Miller (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Robert L Mathews (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Walster (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported William Allen Simpson (Mar 16)
- Re: V6 still not supported William Allen Simpson (Mar 16)
- Re: V6 still not supported Saku Ytti (Mar 16)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 17)
- Re: V6 still not supported borg (Mar 17)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 17)