nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers
From: Paul Timmins <paul () telcodata us>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 15:02:49 -0400
How many times have I seen an installer only download the parts it needs vs just reinstall the next version right over top of the existing version? I know stuff like xplane seems to do a comparison of file signatures and only downloads the changed parts for the updates between whatever version I have and whatever version is current now, but I'd imagine a lot of installers these days just take advantage of the fact the user has a super fast connection and they don't have to care about shipping the entire new installer just to run an update.
Not to mention whatever amounts of shovelware come with a few megabyte print driver for a modern printer/scanner/copier. Let's just include a copy of McAfee endpoint protection in this java update in case the user opts into selecting that as an option during install? etc.
-Paul On 6/6/22 14:24, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> said:I meant downloads as in gigantic games. If you give them more bandwidth it just encourages the game makes to build bigger game downloads.I don't buy that - users are still constrained on storage, especially on consoles.
Current thread:
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers, (continued)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 07)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Jun 07)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 07)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers David Conrad (Jun 07)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Masataka Ohta (Jun 08)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (Jun 07)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Denis Fondras (Jun 07)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 07)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Andrew Odlyzko via NANOG (Jun 07)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Jun 07)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Paul Timmins (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Eric Kuhnke (Jun 08)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Brandon Butterworth (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Brandon Butterworth (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Kord Martin (Jun 06)
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG (Jun 01)