nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:07:40 -0700
On 6/6/22 6:06 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
One thing to be said is that you could use more real estate instead of upping the resolution. like, having a jumbotron in your living room. will that be the next big thing? probably not, but it is a possibilityOn Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 5:47 AM Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:Dave Taht wrote:Looking back 10 years, I was saying the same things, only then I felt it was 25Mbit circa mike belshe's paper. So real bandwidth requirements only doubling every decade might be a new equation to think about...Required resolution of pictures is bounded by resolution of our eyes, which is fixed. For TVs at homes, IMHO, baseband 2k should be enough, quality of which may be better than highly compressed 4k. Masataka OhtaYep. And despite our best efforts, nobody can hear the difference between 48khz/24 bit audio and 96khz/24 bit audio. The difference between 16 bit and 24 bit audio can be heard... but not so much on bluetooth earbuds! Attempts to make 10 channel audio more popular (like Atmos) appeal to a very narrow market. Belshe's paper on "more bandwidth doesn't matter (much) from 2008: https://docs.google.com/a/chromium.org/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=Y2hyb21pdW0ub3JnfGRldnxneDoxMzcyOWI1N2I4YzI3NzE2
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers, (continued)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Christopher Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 01)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jun 01)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Jun 01)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 02)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Masataka Ohta (Jun 03)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 05)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Masataka Ohta (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 02)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Casey Russell via NANOG (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jason Canady (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Casey Russell via NANOG (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Kord Martin (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Casey Russell via NANOG (Jun 06)