nanog mailing list archives
Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 19:42:18 +0000
Randy, Great idea! And bill the taxpayers! -mel via cell
On Jun 20, 2022, at 11:55 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote: I treat these folk with the same respect they afford me. Not once in 30 years of having a connected network (v4 or v6) has any entity asked "is it OK if we .. ?".how strange, considering you are replying to a thread doing so. fwiw, i appreciate vuln scanners. i do not have the hubris or tools to think i run a flawless network or servers. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities, (continued)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities goemon--- via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Carsten Bormann (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Mel Beckman (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Carsten Bormann (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Michael Butler via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Matthew Craig (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Robert L Mathews (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Mel Beckman (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities bzs (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities bzs (Jun 21)