nanog mailing list archives
Re: irrd or ...?
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 19:09:22 -0300
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 6:07 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
It will also take much less RAM if you turn RPKI validation off.oh dear ghod. do i need to turn the dancing donkeys off too? "Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh rather than complicate old programs by adding new "features"." -- ken thompson - unix philosophy a good side to a bit of economic contraction might be a side effect of code bloat and featuritis contraction.to be clearer, i now run a 4GB VM with irrd2, rancid, nfsen, and a wiki. so i will stick with irrd2.
Yeap, we tried installing IRRd 4 in a similar VM that used to run TC and it was a catastrophic failure. Although it was 4.0beta2 and some changes we are made since (IRRd4 is now at 4.2.4), I don't think they were enough to change the outcome. Rubens
Current thread:
- irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 19)
- Re: irrd or ...? Job Snijders via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: irrd or ...? Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jun 20)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)