nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:12:12 -0500 (CDT)
Less vanity over there? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> To: nanog () nanog org Sent: Friday, June 10, 2022 7:17:47 PM Subject: Re: Upstream bandwidth usage On 6/10/22 17:26, Kord Martin wrote:
Especially when you consider that XGSPON and GPON and coexist.
We've seen proposals from Huawei, for example, where OLT shelves can support both GPON and XG-PON line cards. Just not seeing our market going in that direction yet. Mark.
Current thread:
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage, (continued)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Dave Bell (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jared Mauch (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Kord Martin (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Aled Morris via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Brandon Martin (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jay Hennigan (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Karsten Thomann via NANOG (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Dave Taht (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 12)