nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC BDC engineer?
From: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:47:39 -0400
There still is no clarification on the requirement of an official PE stamp. My personal feeling is that if it's not decided by now, the week after filing opens, it would be an unreasonable burden for filers. I believe it's more "professional engineer" like a CPNI for CBRS. On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 11:44 AM KCI Dave Logan via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
Hi all. We operate a small regional ISP in Colorado, but no size is too small to ignore the FCC, as you all know. We're really struggling to find the required engineer for the filing, and we're small enough that we don't have an officer with engineering credentials. Any pointers in the CO/WY/NE/KS area would be great, on or off list. I sure hope we're the only org with this problem still, and all the rest of you are good to go. Thanks, dave -- Dave Logan Kentec Communications, Inc. 970-522-8107
Current thread:
- FCC BDC engineer? KCI Dave Logan via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Josh Luthman (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Tom Mitchell (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Brough Turner (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Andrew Latham (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Jared Mauch (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Bryan Fields (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Matthew Petach (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Glenn Kelley (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Brandon Martin (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Jay Hennigan (Jul 05)
- Re: FCC BDC engineer? Josh Luthman (Jul 05)