nanog mailing list archives
Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 04:16:49 +0200
Peace, On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 11:01 PM Jay Hennigan <jay () west net> wrote:
On 1/30/22 17:06, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:IPv6 is now cheap as chips. It's very dirty therefore. All kinds of bots, spammers, password brute force programs live in there, and it's significantly harder to correlate and ditch these with the sparse IPv6 address space.Then you're doing it wrong.
You might've noticed that I'm sharing experience of someone else, not me. Also, this is exactly the kind of problem denial that made it difficult to adopt many technologies in the past. You may go to great lengths in adjusting your filtering algorithms but when e.g. (I'm making up figures now, obviously) the SNR of UGC in IPv4 is like 10x times it is in IPv6, your management would start asking questions about whether it's really the best time to invest in this rather than in another potential revenue stream. -- Töma
Current thread:
- Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Smahena Amakran (Jan 27)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 30)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Matt Harris (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Jay Hennigan (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Gary E. Miller (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 30)