nanog mailing list archives

Re: What do you think about the "cloudification" of mobile?


From: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:11:55 -0500

Mark,

Use the 12 foot ladder to get over the 10 foot paywall:

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fbusiness%2Fwill-the-cloud-business-eat-the-5g-telecoms-industry%2F21806999

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:12 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:



On 1/19/22 21:52, Michael Thomas wrote:


There was an article in the Economist (sorry if it's paywalled) about
Dish entering the mobile market using an AWS backend. I don't think
that AWS brings much more than compute for the most part so I don't
really get why this would be a huge win. A win maybe, but a huge win?
I can certainly see that not having tons of legacy and accreted
inertia is big win, but that's true of any disruptor. In the end they
still need base stations, spectrum, backhaul and all of that to run
their network, right?

Am I missing something, or is this mainly hype?

Mike


https://www.economist.com/business/will-the-cloud-business-eat-the-5g-telecoms-industry/21806999


It's behind a pay wall, so can't read the entire article.

But AFAICT, the way AWS's 5G service works is that they can provide an
entire solution (towers, backhaul, back-end, even SIM cards), or just
the back-end.

I believe the latter is called Wavelength:

     https://aws.amazon.com/wavelength/features/

I'd say it is a legitimate threat to traditional MNO's. One does not
require to build a national-scale mobile network from scratch... if you
can service a small community of some 500 people in a manner that is
affordable to them, and gives you a nice return so you can buy some food
at the end of each month, no reason why that is not a successful and
sustainable model.

Heck, you probably don't even need to offer classic voice and SMS
services. There are plenty of IP-based apps that will do this for you,
and I know many people who have totally given up packages that include
voice minutes and SMS messages, in favour of data-only services from
their MNO. They are thriving.

So if a small mobile operator using AWS 5G as a back-end does not need
to negotiate massive interconnect contracts and deals with other telco's
in the area, and their handful of customers are fine with just Internet
access as the only service, makes a lot of sense to me.

As I've been saying for a long time now, the telco model is a dying one.
Customers only care about the problems we can help them solve, not
whether we are a Tier-1, or how many TV shows were "Brought to you by..."

Mark.



Current thread: