nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:51:32 +0200
On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 at 19:22, Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com> wrote:
True, but in general MPLS is more costly. It's available on limited devices, from limited vendors. Infact, many of these vendors, like Extreme, charge you if you want to enable MPLS features on a box
Marketing, not fundamentals. DC people are driving demand for VXLAN and SRv6, because they assume MPLS is something scary and complex. So vendors implement something scary and complex to appease DC people. I'm sure in some years to the future, DC people will re-invent MPLS to simplify their stack. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead?, (continued)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? Raymond Burkholder (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? scott (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Jeff Tantsura (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Colton Conor (Jan 16)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 16)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Brandon Butterworth (Jan 16)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 17)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 17)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Jeff Tantsura (Jan 16)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Jeff Tantsura (Jan 16)