nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Route Monitoring
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 09:50:25 +0200
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 15:48, Sandoiu Mihai <Mihai.Sandoiu () wwz ch> wrote:
I am trying to find a solution that does not require much scripting or customization.
Suggestion to run BMP is a fine suggestion. Another option is plain old BGP, setup iBGP+best-external (w/ add-path if you may receive >1 copy from local eBGP neighbours) from these boxes to a collector bgp, maybe with a prefix-list filter to send only this prefix. Then have the collector box raise an alert when it doesn't receive the route from one of them. Writing this from scratch in any language that has a free BGP library (shockingly most open source BGP implementations are written 'wrong', with tight coupling of consumer code and protocol, instead of separated protocol library and consumer code, robbing us from BGP libraries in many languages) is maybe 1h of work. Or you could use any open source or commercial BGP implementation and query those (if you did prefix-filtering on source nodes, the entire RIB is 0 to 2 prefixes), but this would require some work still, as you'd need to query them either via some API or SSH. What does 'much scripting or customisation' mean. I fear it means that none of these, nor BMP work, as you still need to query for the data somehow and act on it somehow and you just want to copy paste 'conf term; ip do-the-thing', which I'm afraid isn't available. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- BGP Route Monitoring Sandoiu Mihai (Jan 06)
- RE: BGP Route Monitoring Adam Thompson (Jan 06)
- RE: BGP Route Monitoring Michael Hare via NANOG (Jan 06)
- Re: BGP Route Monitoring Charles Monson (Jan 06)
- Re: BGP Route Monitoring Saku Ytti (Jan 06)
- Re: BGP Route Monitoring Paul Rolland (Jan 07)
- RE: BGP Route Monitoring Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Jan 07)
- Re: BGP Route Monitoring Don Thomas Jacob (Jan 13)
- Re: BGP Route Monitoring Mark Tinka (Jan 13)
- RE: BGP Route Monitoring Adam Thompson (Jan 06)