nanog mailing list archives
Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN
From: Peter Beckman <beckman () angryox com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:01:09 -0500
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 2/17/22 11:58 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-finds-two-providers-failed-fully-implement-stirshaken-0 The Federal Communications Commission today took action to ensure that voice service providers meet their commitments and obligations to implement STIR/SHAKEN standards to combat spoofed robocall scams. Specifically, voice service providers Bandwidth and Vonage lost a partial exemption from STIR/SHAKEN because they failed to meet STIR/SHAKEN implementation commitments and have been referred to the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau for further investigation.So for probably a year or so before the Stir/Shaken mandate came, I have been seeing a lot less phone spam. I don't know if that's typical but it was quite noticeable for me. What that tells me is that providers likely started clamping down on their shady customers well ahead of the mandate which says that regulatory fiat would have been sufficient too. But that hinges on whether my situation is typical though.
Reading the actual FCC order, Bandwidth HAS implemented STIR/SHAKEN everywhere EXCEPT on some legacy hardware that does not support adding the headers. While Bandwidth should have either replaced the hardware or updated the software to support it by now, they did not, and they got slapped for it. It may be that the customers connected to that hardware are being difficult, or that, as a CLEC, they have a crap-ton of older hardware in different physical switch locations that they couldn't or just didn't get to upgrading or replacing. I asked Bandwidth for details, nothing yet. Beckman --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman () angryox com https://www.angryox.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Sean Donelan (Feb 17)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Dovid Bender (Feb 18)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN goemon--- via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Peter Beckman (Feb 18)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Josh Luthman (Feb 20)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Michael Thomas (Feb 21)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Brandon Svec via NANOG (Feb 25)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Tom Mitchell (Feb 24)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Matthew Petach (Feb 24)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Tom Beecher (Feb 25)
- Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN Michael Thomas (Feb 18)