nanog mailing list archives
Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections
From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:10:38 -0800
Depends on many factors… If the whole HOA wanted service, then a licensed link could possibly be put in delivering a high capacity circuit delivering about 100 Mbps to the subscriber. Price to the customer would vary depending on how the deal is structured with the HOA/property management company. Could also look into getting some fiber delivered and feed it from that. -Mike
On Feb 16, 2022, at 17:02, Cory Sell <corysell () protonmail com> wrote: Out of pure curiosity, let’s assume they COULD put an antenna on the roof… What is the service? Bandwidth, latency expectation, cost? Note that in almost every condominium or apartment complex I have heard of, they do NOT allow roof builds. This is why satellite TV in those areas require people to put an antenna on their patio, even if it’s half-blocked.On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 6:51 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com> wrote: If they allow antennas on the roof, we can service them :) Your house, on the other hand, we already lucked out on that one! -Mike Lyon Ridge WirelessOn Feb 16, 2022, at 16:48, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 1:16 PM Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> wrote: I'll once again please ask for specific examples as I continue to see the generic "it isn't in some parts of San Jose".You want a specific example? Friend of mine asked me to help them get better Internet connectivity a few weeks ago. They live here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Meridian+Woods+Condos/@37.3200394,-121.9792261,17.47z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x808fca909a8f5605:0x399cdd468d99300c!8m2!3d37.3190694!4d-121.9818295 Just off of I-280 in the heart of San Jose. I dug and dug, and called different companies. The only service they can get there is the 768K DSL service they already have with AT&T. Go ahead. Try it for yourself. See what service you can order to those condos. Heart of Silicon Valley. Worse connectivity than many rural areas. :( Matt
Current thread:
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections, (continued)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Brian Johnson (Feb 28)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Brandon Svec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Josh Luthman (Feb 17)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Matthew Petach (Feb 16)
- RE: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Ray Van Dolson via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Cory Sell via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Lyon (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Cory Sell via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Lyon (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Dave Taht (Feb 16)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Hammett (Feb 19)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections sronan (Feb 19)
- Message not available
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Hammett (Feb 19)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Martin Hannigan (Feb 19)