nanog mailing list archives
Re: email spam
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks () mukund org>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:11:48 +0530
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:50:22PM -0700, Jay Hennigan wrote:
On 8/23/22 18:33, William Herrin wrote:Hello, To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems,Sigh. They are substantially less zealous about preventing spam from leaving their systems.
+1 on the observation. @gmail.com addresses constitute the largest number of spam rejections on our office MX. These have passed SPF and DKIM validation. Would Google not be able to scan outgoing emails for spam activity? Our MX's SpamAssassin spam filter is able to detect most of them by content. Is Google unable to do better than what they currently do for outgoing email? (It is understandable some don't like spam filtering at all. But practically, if all these spam emails were delivered, email would become almost unusable.) Mukund
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: email spam, (continued)
- Re: email spam Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 23)
- RE: email spam Jeremy Chequer (Aug 23)
- Re: email spam Crist Clark (Aug 23)
- Re: email spam Tom Beecher (Aug 24)
- Re: email spam Anne Mitchell (Aug 24)
- Re: email spam Nick Boyce (Aug 29)
- Re: email spam Jawaid Bazyar (Aug 24)
- Re: email spam Matthew Petach (Aug 24)
- Re: email spam Mukund Sivaraman (Aug 23)