![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond...
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:20:44 +0100
Forrest Christian (List Account) <lists () packetflux com> wrote:
Hopefully there will be some movement next year when they're scheduled to discuss it again. It's unfortunate that the first negative leap second is likely to occur before then.
Not that soon! There is not likely to be a leap second for 5 years or so, based on the current projections. The value to keep an eye on is UT1-UTC which is required by ITU TF.460 to be between -0.9s and +0.9s; leap seconds are added by the IERS to keep it in range. Broadcast time signals include a DUT1 value that is UT1-UTC rounded to 0.1s precision, which must be between -0.8s and +0.8s. DUT1 is currently 0.0s. In the last couple of decades, DUT1 has decreased by about 1ms per day (on average) which requires a positive leap second every few years. In 2016, the length of day was 1.5ms greater than 24h; since then the long term estimated LoD has been fairly steadily decreasing. It dropped below 24h at the end of 2020, and it's now 0.34ms short. (The LoD increased slowly in the second half of 2021, but it has been decreasing all this year.) Depending on the threshold the IERS chooses, the current long-term LoD estimate suggests a negative leap second some time between the end of 2026 (for a 0.5s threshold) and the end of 2029 (for a 0.9s threshold). That is without making any more complicated predictions based on the downward trend of the estimated long-term LoD. These numbers come from IERS Bulletin A https://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/Bulletins/bulletins.html analyzed by my program https://github.com/fanf2/bulletin-a/ My blog article from when this issue became more well known: https://dotat.at/@/2020-11-13-leap-second-hiatus.html My other collected links on this topic https://dotat.at/writing/time.html -- Tony Finch <dot () dotat at> https://dotat.at/ Thames, Dover, Wight, Portland, Plymouth: Northeast 3 to 5, veering east 2 to 4 later in Thames, Dover and Wight. Smooth or slight, but in Plymouth slight, occasionally moderate at first in west and smooth later in northeast. Fair. Good.
Current thread:
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond..., (continued)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 03)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Matthew Kaufman (Aug 08)
- RE: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Daniel Marks via NANOG (Aug 03)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Harlan Stenn (Aug 08)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Forrest Christian (List Account) (Aug 03)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... John Levine (Aug 04)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Forrest Christian (List Account) (Aug 04)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 08)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Billy Croan (Aug 10)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... John R. Levine (Aug 10)
- Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond... Tony Finch (Aug 12)