nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT - The end of the internet
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 08:14:17 +0300
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 07:54, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
On a more positive note, the IPv6 IoT can be seen as an experiment on how we can scale the internet another order of magnitude or 2 without taking the power or the spectrum consumption to the parallel levels.
I think at least the next 20 years of IoT is thread (and wifi for high BW)+matter, and IoT devices won't have IP that is addressable even from the user LAN, you go via GW, none of which you configure. Some bits of if look unnecessarily forced perspective, like the addressing scheme, instead of inlining your role in PDU we use this cutesy addressing scheme looks like bit forced marketing of IPv6, doesn't seem necessary but also not really an important decision either way. Overall I think thread+matter are well designed and they make me quite optimistic of reasonable IoT outcomes. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- IoT - The end of the internet Christopher Wolff (Aug 09)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Mel Beckman (Aug 09)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Fred Baker (Aug 09)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Mel Beckman (Aug 09)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Aug 09)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Saku Ytti (Aug 09)
- RE: IoT - The end of the internet Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Aug 10)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Saku Ytti (Aug 10)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Fred Baker (Aug 09)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Mel Beckman (Aug 09)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Alexander Lyamin via NANOG (Aug 10)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Jorge Amodio (Aug 10)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Doug Barton (Aug 10)
- Re: IoT - The end of the internet Alexander Lyamin via NANOG (Aug 10)